Logo image
Lower reproductive rate and lamb survival contribute to lower lamb marking rate in maiden ewes compared to multiparous ewes
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Lower reproductive rate and lamb survival contribute to lower lamb marking rate in maiden ewes compared to multiparous ewes

D. Hutchison, B.E. Clarke, S. Hancock, A.N. Thompson, E. Bowen and C. Jacobson
Animals, Vol.12(4), Article 513
2022
pdf
Maiden ewes.pdfDownloadView
Published (Version of Record)CC BY V4.0 Open Access
url
Free to Read *No subscription requiredView

Abstract

Suboptimal reproductive performance of maiden (primiparous) ewes remains a source of inefficiency for the Australian sheep industry. However, the extent and causes of the poorer reproductive performance of maiden ewes on Australian sheep farms are not well understood. Here, we show the reproductive performance of maiden ewes relative to their multiparous counterparts on the same farms across Australia using a cohort survey. The difference in marking rate for non-Merino maiden ewe lambs compared to multiparous ewes was 58% (74 vs. 132%; p < 0.001), and this was attributable to a 50% difference in reproductive rate (109 vs. 159%; p < 0.001) and 16% difference in lamb survival to marking (67 vs. 83%; p < 0.001). The difference in marking rate for maiden Merino two-tooth ewes lambing at approximately 2 years-of-age compared to mature multiparous ewes was 22% (80 vs. 102%; p < 0.001) and this was attributable to a 24% difference in reproductive rate (108 vs. 132%; p < 0.001) and 3% difference for lamb survival (75 vs. 78%; p < 0.05). Positive correlations for reproduction traits (reproductive rate, lamb survival and marking rate) between maidens and multiparous ewes were observed for maiden Merino two-tooth ewes (p < 0.001), but these correlations were weak or non-existent for non-Merino ewe lambs. Strategies to improve both reproductive rate and lamb survival can address the poorer and more variable reproductive performance of maiden ewes.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

28 File views/ downloads
115 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
3.51 Dairy & Animal Sciences
3.51.115 Livestock Reproduction
Web Of Science research areas
Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science
Veterinary Sciences
Zoology
ESI research areas
Plant & Animal Science
Logo image