Files and links (1)
CC BY V4.0, Open Access
Journal article
Management of Body Condition Score between Pregnancy Scanning and Lamb Marking Impacts the Survival of Triplet-Bearing Ewes and Their Lambs
Animals (Basel), Vol.13(13), 2057
2023
Abstract
This study evaluated the impacts of management of body condition score (BCS) between pregnancy scanning and lamb marking on the mortality of triplet-bearing ewes and their lambs at 19 research sites across Southern Australia. Triplet-bearing ewes of Maternal (crossbred or composite) or Merino breed were randomly allocated to treatment at pregnancy scanning at an average of 97 days from the start of joining: High or Low BCS. The BCS of individual ewes was assessed at pregnancy scanning, pre-lambing (average of 137 days from the start of joining) and marking (average of 165 days from the end of joining), and ewe and lamb mortality to marking, recorded for each mob. The average BCS at pregnancy scanning was 3.4 for Maternal ewes and 3.3 for Merino ewes. There were no breed by BCS treatment effects on the BCS of ewes at pregnancy scanning or lamb marking or on the change in BCS between pregnancy scanning and pre-lambing or between pre-lambing and marking. The change in BCS differed between the High and Low BCS treatments, between pregnancy scanning and pre-lambing (0.12 vs. −0.33; p < 0.001) and between pre-lambing and marking (−0.39 vs. 0.07; p < 0.001) but did not differ between breeds. The average BCS at marking for ewes managed at the High and Low BCS treatments was 3.1 and 3.0 for Maternals and 3.0 and 2.8 for Merinos. Survival of triplet-bearing Merino ewes (p < 0.01) and their lambs (p < 0.001) was greater when ewes were managed at the High BCS compared to the Low BCS. The BCS treatment did not impact the survival of Maternal ewes or their lambs. The survival of Merino but not Maternal lambs was higher when ewes were in greater BCS pre-lambing (p < 0.01) and when ewes gained BCS between pregnancy scanning and pre-lambing (p < 0.01). Ewe mortality was lower when ewes gained BCS between pregnancy scanning and pre-lambing (p < 0.05). Merino ewes were more likely to die than Maternal ewes for a given change in BCS between pregnancy scanning and pre-lambing (p = 0.065). Overall, our findings demonstrate that producers should manage the nutrition of triplet-bearing Merino ewes so that ewes are in greater BCS at lambing and/or to gain BCS between pregnancy scanning and lambing to improve ewe and lamb survival. Triplet-bearing Maternal ewes should be managed to gain BCS between pregnancy scanning and lambing to improve ewe survival.
Details
- Title
- Management of Body Condition Score between Pregnancy Scanning and Lamb Marking Impacts the Survival of Triplet-Bearing Ewes and Their Lambs
- Authors/Creators
- Emmanuelle Haslin - Murdoch University, School of Agricultural SciencesTravis Allington - Murdoch UniversitySarah E. Blumer - Murdoch UniversityJohan Boshoff - University of New EnglandBronwyn E. Clarke - Murdoch University, Centre for Animal Production and HealthSerina N. Hancock - Murdoch University, Centre for Animal Production and HealthGavin A. Kearney - School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Tennent Drive, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand Centre for Animal Production and Health, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, University of New England, Elm Avenue, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia 36 Paynes Road, Hamilton, VIC 3300, Australia Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 89 Sydney Road, Benalla, VIC 3672, Australia New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Cowra Agricultural Research and Advisory Station, 296 Binni Creek Road, Cowra, NSW 2351, Australia J.T. Agri-Source, 2A Bradley Drive, Melbourne, VIC 3082, AustraliaPaul R. Kenyon - Massey UniversityJarryd Krog - Murdoch UniversityLyndon J. Kubeil - Murdoch UniversityAmy Lockwood - School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Tennent Drive, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand Centre for Animal Production and Health, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, University of New England, Elm Avenue, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia 36 Paynes Road, Hamilton, VIC 3300, Australia Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 89 Sydney Road, Benalla, VIC 3672, Australia New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Cowra Agricultural Research and Advisory Station, 296 Binni Creek Road, Cowra, NSW 2351, Australia J.T. Agri-Source, 2A Bradley Drive, Melbourne, VIC 3082, AustraliaGordon Refshauge - New South Wales Department of Primary IndustriesJason P. Trompf - School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Tennent Drive, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand Centre for Animal Production and Health, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, University of New England, Elm Avenue, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia 36 Paynes Road, Hamilton, VIC 3300, Australia Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 89 Sydney Road, Benalla, VIC 3672, Australia New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Cowra Agricultural Research and Advisory Station, 296 Binni Creek Road, Cowra, NSW 2351, Australia J.T. Agri-Source, 2A Bradley Drive, Melbourne, VIC 3082, AustraliaAndrew N. Thompson - Murdoch University, Centre for Animal Production and Health
- Publication Details
- Animals (Basel), Vol.13(13), 2057
- Publisher
- MDPI
- Grant note
- L.LSM.0013 / Meat and Livestock Australia
- Identifiers
- 991005595968807891
- Copyright
- © 2023 by the authors.
- Murdoch Affiliation
- School of Agricultural Sciences; Centre for Animal Production and Health
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Metrics
22 File views/ downloads
96 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Citation topics
- 3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
- 3.51 Dairy & Animal Sciences
- 3.51.115 Livestock Reproduction
- Web Of Science research areas
- Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science
- Veterinary Sciences
- Zoology
- ESI research areas
- Plant & Animal Science