Energetics Sex determination Sex-reversal Pogona vitticeps Bassiana duperreyi
Vertebrate sex is typically determined genetically, but in many ectotherms sex can be determined by genes (Genetic Sex Determination: GSD), temperature (Temperature-dependent Sex Determination: TSD), or interactions between genes and temperature during development. Temperature dependent sex determination may involve GSD systems with either male or female heterogamety (XX/XY or ZZ/ZW) where temperature overrides chromosomal sex determination to cause a mismatch between genetic sex and phenotypic sex (sex-reversal). In these temperature-sensitive lineages, phylogenetic investigations point to recurrent evolutionary shifts between genotypic and temperature-dependent sex determination. These evolutionary transitions in sex determination can occur rapidly if selection favours the reversed sex over their concordant phenotypic sex. To investigate the consequences of sex-reversal on offspring phenotypes, we measured two energy-driven traits (metabolism and growth) and 6-month survival in two species of reptile with different patterns of temperature-induced sex-reversal. Male sex-reversal occurs in Bassiana duperreyi when chromosomal females (femaleXX) develop male phenotypes (maleSRXX), while female sex-reversal occurs in Pogona vitticeps when chromosomal males (maleZZ) develop female phenotypes (femaleSRZZ). We show metabolism in maleSRXX was like that of maleXY, that is, reflective of phenotypic sex and lower than genotypic sex. In contrast, for Pogona vitticeps, femaleSRZZ metabolism was intermediate between maleZZ and femaleZW metabolic rate. For both species, our data indicate that differences in metabolism become more apparent as individuals become larger. Our findings provide some evidence for an energetic advantage from sex-reversal in both species but do not exclude energetic processes as a constraint on the distribution of sex-reversal in nature.
Details
Title
Metabolic consequences of sex-reversal in two lizard species: A test of the like genotype and like phenotype hypotheses
Authors/Creators
Kristoffer H Wild - Australian National University
John H Roe - University of North Carolina at Pembroke
Lisa Schwanz - UNSW Sydney
Essie Rodgers - Murdoch University
Duminda S B Dissanayake - University of Canberra
Arthur Georges - University of Canberra
Stephen D Sarre - University of Canberra
Daniel W A Noble - Australian National University
Publication Details
Journal of experimental biology, Vol.226(13), jeb245657