Logo image
Back
Models for measurement, precision, and the nondichotomization of graded responses
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Models for measurement, precision, and the nondichotomization of graded responses

D. Andrich
Psychometrika, Vol.60(1), pp.7-26
1995
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294426
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

It is common in educational, psychological, and social measurement in general, to collect data in the form of graded responses and then to combine adjacent categories. It has been argued that because the division of the continuum into categories is arbitrary, any model used for analyzing graded responses should accommodate such action. Specifically, Jansen and Roskam (1986) enunciate ajoining assumption which specifies that if two categoriesj andk are combined to form categoryh, then the probability of a response inh should equal the sum of the probabilities of responses inj andk. As a result, they question the use of the Rasch model for graded responses which explicitly prohibits the combining of categories after the data are collected except in more or less degenerate cases. However, the Rasch model is derived from requirements of invariance of comparisons of entities with respect to different instruments, which might include different partitions of the continuum, and is consistent with fundamental measurement. Therefore, there is a strong case that the mathematical implication of the Rasch model should be studied further in order to understand how and why it conflicts with the joining assumption. This paper pursues the mathematics of the Rasch model and establishes, through a special case when the sizes of the categories are equal and when the model is expressed in the multiplicative metric, that its probability distribution reflects the precision with which the data are collected, and that if a pair of categories is collapsed after the data are collected, it no longer reflects the original precision. As a consequence, and not because of a qualitative change in the variable, the joining assumption is destroyed when categories are combined. Implications of the choice between a model which satisfies the joining assumption or one which reflects on the precision of the data collection considered are discussed.

Details

Metrics

33 Record Views
53 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.73 Social Psychology
6.73.685 Item Response Theory
Web Of Science research areas
Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications
Psychology, Mathematical
Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods
ESI research areas
Psychiatry/Psychology
Logo image