Logo image
Neutralising rivaroxaban induced interference in laboratory testing for lupus anticoagulant (LA): A comparative study using DOAC Stop and andexanet alfa
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Neutralising rivaroxaban induced interference in laboratory testing for lupus anticoagulant (LA): A comparative study using DOAC Stop and andexanet alfa

E. Favaloro, G. Gilmore, S. Arunachalam, S. Mohammed and R. Baker
Thrombosis Research, Vol.180, pp.10-19
2019
pdf
Neutralising rivaroxaban induced interference in laboratory testing for lupus anticoagulant.pdfDownloadView
Author’s Version Open Access
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Introduction Lupus anticoagulant (LA) investigation in patients on anticoagulant therapy is problematic. Rivaroxaban in particular causes significant interference, prolonging both LA screening and confirmation tests, and falsely raising LA screen/confirm ratios, leading to potential false identification of LA. The Russell Viper Venom Time (RVVT) assay, key to the investigation of LA, is especially sensitive to rivaroxaban. Materials and methods We assessed cross laboratory (n = 82) testing of four samples to investigate whether rivaroxaban induced interference in LA testing could be neutralised. Testing was performed blind to sample type. The samples comprised: (A) A pool of normal plasma (LA-negative control); (B) sample A spiked with rivaroxaban (200 ng/mL) to create rivaroxaban-induced interference (LA ‘false’ positive sample); (C) sample B subsequently treated with a commercial ‘DOAC-neutraliser’ (DOAC Stop); (D) sample B treated with andexanet alfa (200 μg/mL). Results As expected, the rivaroxaban-spiked sample (B) caused prolongation of most LA-tests, and also generated a falsely prolonged RVVT screen/confirm ratio (median 1.37, compared to 0.97 for sample A). The sample (C) treated with DOAC Stop evidenced a correction in LA-test clotting times, as well as neutralising the false positive LA (median RVVT screen/confirm ratio of 0.99). Although the andexanet alfa treated sample (D) also yielded a low median RVVT screen/confirm ratio of 0.88, it did not fully correct LA-test clotting times. Consistent with test findings, all laboratories interpreted samples A and C as being LA-negative. For sample B (rivaroxaban), 45.3% identified this as LA positive, and 38.7% identified LA interference. Most (61.3%) also identified sample D as LA negative, with the remainder (38.7%) identifying LA interference. Conclusions DOAC Stop was able to neutralise the false LA activity induced by rivaroxaban, both in terms of clot-times and LA ratios. In contrast, whilst andexanet alfa negated the rivaroxaban-prolonged LA-ratio, it did not fully correct clot-times, leaving some residual LA interference, and requiring additional testing to investigate prolonged clotting times.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

219 File views/ downloads
148 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.75 Blood Clotting
1.75.326 Antiphospholipid Syndrome
Web Of Science research areas
Hematology
Peripheral Vascular Disease
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image