Logo image
On decision makers’ perceptions of what an ecological computer model is, what it does, and its impact on limiting model acceptance
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

On decision makers’ perceptions of what an ecological computer model is, what it does, and its impact on limiting model acceptance

F. Boschetti, M. Hughes, C. Jones and H.M. Lozano-Montes
Sustainability, Vol.10(8), Article 2767
2018
pdf
sustainability-10-02767.pdfDownloadView
Published (Version of Record)CC BY-NC V4.0 Open Access
url
Free to Read *No subscription requiredView

Abstract

Environmental decision makers are required to understand complex ecological processes and ecological computer models are designed to facilitate this understanding. A set of interviews reveals three main perceptions affecting senior environmental decision makers' trust in ecological computer models as decision facilitation tools: an ecological computer model is perceived as (i) a 'black box', (ii) processing poorly documented, sparse and out-of-date input data, and (iii) whose sensitivity to model parameters enables manipulation to produce desired outcomes justifying pre-conceived decisions. This leads to lack of trust towards both ecological computer models and model-users, including other scientists and decision makers. Model acceptance appears to depend on the amount, currency and geographical origin of input data. This is at odds with modellers' communication style, which typically places more emphasis on highlighting the ecological computer model's features and performance, rather than on describing the input data. Developing 'big data' capabilities could deliver the large, real-time, local data that may enhance acceptance. However, the size and complexity of 'big data' requires automated pre-processing, using modelling and algorithms that are even more inscrutable than current ecological computer models. Future trust in ecological computer models will likely depend on how this dilemma is resolved, which is likely to require improved communication between modellers and decision makers.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#14 Life Below Water
#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Metrics

80 File views/ downloads
34 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
3.2 Marine Biology
3.2.92 Fisheries Ecology
Web Of Science research areas
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Studies
Green & Sustainable Science & Technology
ESI research areas
Environment/Ecology
Logo image