Logo image
Openness and appropriation: Empirical evidence from Australian businesses
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Openness and appropriation: Empirical evidence from Australian businesses

F. Huang, J. Rice, P. Galvin and N. Martin
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.61(4), pp.488-498
2014
pdf
openness-and-appropriation.pdf242.58 kBDownloadView
Author’s Version Open Access
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Appropriation Australian businesses open innovation paradox of openness
The adoption of open innovation creates a dilemma for firms. On one hand, a commitment to openness facilitates the flow of knowledge between firms, with this flow (generally) unconstrained by royalties and other appropriation mechanisms. However, openness has also led to unintended knowledge spillovers, limiting firms’ abilities to protect their core knowledge. This dilemma has created a need to consider the relationship between openness and firms’ appropriability regimes. In order to explore this “paradox of openness,” an investigation of the appropriability regimes adopted by Australian firms through an empirical analysis of innovation-related data from 4 322 businesses was undertaken. It was found that the relationship between two indicators of openness (the breadth of external knowledge sources and the scope of interorganizational collaborations) and the scope of appropriability regimes employed by a firm exhibits a nonlinear inverse-U (∩) form. The results also indicated that open innovators actually increase controls on their intellectual property through informal appropriability regimes rather than loosening appropriability mechanisms to promote knowledge spillovers as open innovation theories suggest.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

Source: InCites

Metrics

228 File views/ downloads
182 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.3 Management
6.3.2 Innovation Strategies
Web Of Science research areas
Business
Engineering, Industrial
Management
ESI research areas
Economics & Business
Logo image