Logo image
Outcomes for women in a flexible sigmoidoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening programme
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Outcomes for women in a flexible sigmoidoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening programme

C.H. Viiala and J.K. Olynyk
Internal Medicine Journal, Vol.38(2), pp.90-94
2008
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Background:  There are concerns that technical and anatomical factors can reduce the potential benefit of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) as a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tool in women compared with men. Our aim was to review the outcomes for female participants in a community-based CRC screening project using FS. Methods:  In 1995, a programme of unsedated FS-based screening of asymptomatic average-risk individuals aged 55–64 years was established at Fremantle Hospital, Western Australia. Insertion depths, pathological findings and site of adenomas and subject-rated pain scores have been prospectively recorded. Later diagnoses of malignancy were determined by linkage of the cohort with the West Australian Cancer Registry. Results:  Between 1995 and 2005, 3402 primary screening FS examinations had been carried out (women 41%). Mean age of participants was 59.6 years. Women were more likely to undergo a FS with insertion depth less than 40 cm (17 vs 6%, P < 0.0001). Mean pain score was 2.9 for men and 4.0 for women (P < 0.0001). Women were less likely to have any neoplasia detected, independent of pain score or insertion depth (odds ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.4–0.6). Increasing insertion depth from 50 to 60 cm in a woman would only have a 0.4% chance of detecting any additional neoplasia. An insignificant trend to higher incidence of later interval CRC was observed in women with normal sigmoidoscopy. Conclusion:  Women probably undergo FS with more discomfort and lesser insertion depth than men. It is unlikely that moderate increases in insertion depth would have a substantial benefit.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.111 Liver & Colon Cancer
1.111.551 Colonoscopy
Web Of Science research areas
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image