Logo image
Outgroup fanship in Australia and New Zealand
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Outgroup fanship in Australia and New Zealand

J. Halberstadt, R.P. O'Shea and J. Forgas
Australian Journal of Psychology, Vol.58(3), pp.159-165
2011
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

The hypothesis was explored that, as a consequence of the asymmetrical relationship that exists between Australia and New Zealand, Australians will more consistently support New Zealand against third-party sports teams than will New Zealanders support Australia. The hypothesis was supported in two studies in which participants in each country rank-ordered a list of 12 teams (including Australia and New Zealand) from most to least favoured to win various sporting events. New Zealanders were more polarised in their rankings of Australia than vice versa, and the rankings were related to the similarity participants perceived between the two countries. The results are consistent with differences in the amount of attention the two countries pay to each other and with the way success or failure in third-party competitions may impact on the social identity and self-esteem of sporting fans in the two countries.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#10 Reduced Inequalities

Source: InCites

Metrics

19 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.73 Social Psychology
6.73.447 Racial Identity
Web Of Science research areas
Psychology, Multidisciplinary
ESI research areas
Psychiatry/Psychology
Logo image