Journal article
Poor executive functioning in children born very preterm: Using dual-task methodology to untangle alternative theoretical interpretations
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol.152, pp.264-277
2016
Abstract
Two alternative theoretical explanations have been proposed for the difficulties with executive functioning observed in children born very preterm (VP; ⩽32 weeks): a general vulnerability (i.e., in attentional and processing capacities), which has a cascading impact on increasingly complex cognitive functions, and a selective vulnerability in executive-level cognitive processes. It is difficult to tease apart this important theoretical distinction because executive functioning tasks are, by default, complex tasks. In the current study, an experimental dual-task design was employed to control for differences in task difficulty in order to isolate executive control. Participants included 50 VP children (mean age = 7.29 years) and 39 term peer controls (mean age = 7.28 years). The VP group exhibited a greater dual-task cost relative to controls despite experimental control for individual differences in baseline ability on the component single tasks. This group difference also remained under a condition of reduced task difficulty. These results suggest a selective vulnerability in executive-level processes that can be separated from any general vulnerability.
Details
- Title
- Poor executive functioning in children born very preterm: Using dual-task methodology to untangle alternative theoretical interpretations
- Authors/Creators
- L. Delane (Author/Creator) - School of Psychological ScienceD.M. Bayliss (Author/Creator) - The University of Western AustraliaC. Campbell (Author/Creator) - The University of Western AustraliaC. Reid (Author/Creator) - Murdoch UniversityN. French (Author/Creator) - The University of Western AustraliaM. Anderson (Author/Creator) - Murdoch University
- Publication Details
- Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol.152, pp.264-277
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Identifiers
- 991005541646107891
- Copyright
- © 2016 Elsevier Inc.
- Murdoch Affiliation
- School of Psychology and Exercise Science
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Metrics
33 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Citation topics
- 1 Clinical & Life Sciences
- 1.72 Obstetrics & Gynecology
- 1.72.748 Neonatal Intensive Care
- Web Of Science research areas
- Psychology, Developmental
- Psychology, Experimental
- ESI research areas
- Psychiatry/Psychology