Logo image
Post-nationalism, sovereignty and the state
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Post-nationalism, sovereignty and the state

G. Wickham
Journal of Sociology, Vol.57(1), pp.47-58
2021
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

The term ‘post-national formations’ is a product of some of the recent work of Jürgen Habermas. In using this term, Habermas highlights what he regards as a laudatory trend in social and political research. This is the trend away from an intense focus on the role of nation-states – a role he believes to be unconducive to progressive politics – and towards a focus on the role of new configurations – a role he believes to be much more conducive to this type of politics. ‘Post-national formations’, then, is the term Habermas uses to describe new non-state configurations he has identified. He is confident these configurations will eventually break free of the supposed yoke of the nation-state and usher in a new era of progressivism. This article is not concerned with the post-national formations literature per se. Rather, it is concerned with this literature’s failure to take into account the full history of both the nation-state and the notion of sovereignty that helps the nation-state to function. In pursuing this concern, the article draws material from various sources to offer a short historical defence of the sovereign state.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
10 Arts & Humanities
10.126 Philosophy
10.126.2158 Hobbesian Political Thought
Web Of Science research areas
Sociology
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image