Files and links (1)
CC BY-NC-ND V4.0, Open Access
Journal article
Pregnancy scanning of sheep in southern Australia. 2. Accuracy of pregnancy scanning in field data
Animal production science, Vol.65(18), 25233
2025
Abstract
Context
Scanning for fetal count enables producers to alter pre-lambing management of ewes according to litter size, for improving lamb and ewe survival outcomes. However, accurate scanning in industry flocks is important to achieve this goal.
Aims
This study aims to characterise accuracy of scanning in current field data and relate this to lambs recorded at both the ewe and flock levels.
Methods
Four experimental flock data sets and two large industry data sets derived from Sheep Genetics were used to demonstrate the repeatability of scanning and investigate how data quality influences the assessment of accuracy of scanning to predict lambing outcomes.
Key results
Scanning for pregnancy determination and fetal count is highly repeatable for experienced scanners, but at higher litter size (> 2 lambs) error rates in fetal count increase. The accuracy of distinguishing singles from multiples can be higher than for fetal counts. However, accuracy in predicting lambs born from scanning results is more strongly influenced by poor quality of recording lambing outcomes against individual ewes than to scanning errors. Scanning for fetal count does not have as high accuracy for predicting lambs reared due to lamb losses, which are also influenced by litter size.
Conclusions
Technical improvements and slower scanning speed might be required to increase accuracy of fetal counts at high litter size, but the overall impact is relatively low at current mean litter sizes, in flocks where triplet litters are relatively scarce.
Implications
Scanning accuracy is facilitated by using experienced scan practitioners requested to distinguish fetal counts, with appropriate pre-scanning preparation, and with all ewes scanned within correct ranges for fetal age at the time of scanning.
Details
- Title
- Pregnancy scanning of sheep in southern Australia. 2. Accuracy of pregnancy scanning in field data
- Authors/Creators
- Kim L. Bunter - AGBU, joint venture Dept Primary Ind & Reg Dev, Armidale, NSW 2351, AustraliaGordon Refshauge - New South Wales Department of Primary IndustriesThomas Clune - Murdoch University, School of Agricultural SciencesForbes D. Brien - Univ Adelaide, Sch Anim & Vet Sci, Adelaide, SA 5371, Australia
- Publication Details
- Animal production science, Vol.65(18), 25233
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Number of pages
- 13
- Grant note
- L.LSM.0021 / Meat and Livestock Australia; Meat & Livestock Australia ON-00650 / Australian Wool Innovation
- Identifiers
- 991005851088407891
- Copyright
- © 2025 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)).
- Murdoch Affiliation
- School of Agricultural Sciences; Centre for Animal Production and Health
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Metrics
2 File views/ downloads
8 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Citation topics
- 3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
- 3.51 Dairy & Animal Sciences
- 3.51.115 Livestock Reproduction
- Web Of Science research areas
- Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science
- ESI research areas
- Agricultural Sciences