Files and links (1)
Open Access CC BY V4.0
Journal article
Public perceptions of potential adaptations for mitigating heat stress on Australian dairy farms
Journal of dairy science, Vol.105(7), pp.5893-5908
2022
PMID: 35525613
Abstract
Temperature variability resulting from climate change poses challenges around the world for livestock production and the welfare of the animals in these systems. As animal industries attempt to combat these challenges, it is vital to understand how potential changes implemented by farmers resonate with societal values. The aims of this study were to determine how different proposed changes to mitigate heat stress in dairy cattle influence public perceptions toward Australian dairy farm systems, including perceptions of (1) cow welfare, (2) confidence in the industry, and (3) trust in farmers. Participants were presented with 1 of 4 treatments representing a potential solution to mitigate heat stress in dairy cattle: (1) indoor system (a fully indoor barn), (2) choice system (cows have agency to choose to be indoors or outdoors), (3) gene edition + pasture (cows are genetically modified to become more resilient to heat stress), and (4) pasture (outdoor system that is currently used in Australia, but the farmer plants more trees). Participants were then asked to respond to questions on a 7-point Likert scale. Questions were about cow welfare (3 questions), confidence in dairy industry (4 questions), and trust in farmers (9 questions), with each section followed by an open-ended question for participants to explain their answers. Participants perceived cow welfare to be the lowest in the indoor system (2.80 +/- 0.10), followed by gene edition + pasture (4.48 +/- 0.11), with choice and pasture systems being the highest but not different from each other (5.41 +/- 0.11 and 5.32 +/- 0.11, respectively). Confidence in the dairy industry was lower among participants in the indoor (4.78 +/- 0.08) compared with participants assigned to the choice (5.28 +/- 0.08) or pasture (5.25 +/- 0.08) systems. Confidence was also lower among participants in the gene edition (4.95 +/- 0.08) compared with the choice system. Trust in farmers was similar across all treatments. Our results provide the first evidence that the Australian public may be reluctant to accept heat stress mitigation strategies that either do not allow cows to have access to pasture or those that include gene-editing technologies.
Details
- Title
- Public perceptions of potential adaptations for mitigating heat stress on Australian dairy farms
- Authors/Creators
- Jillian Hendricks - University of British ColumbiaKatelyn E. Mills - University of British ColumbiaLara Sirovica - University of British ColumbiaLouise Sundermann - Dairy Australia (Australia)Sarah Bolton - University of British ColumbiaMarina A. G. von Keyserlingk - University of British Columbia
- Publication Details
- Journal of dairy science, Vol.105(7), pp.5893-5908
- Publisher
- Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®
- Number of pages
- 16
- Identifiers
- 991005913218207891
- Copyright
- © 2022, The Authors
- Murdoch Affiliation
- School of Veterinary Medicine
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: SDGs in the Output
Metrics
1 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Industry collaboration
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Citation topics
- 3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
- 3.51 Dairy & Animal Sciences
- 3.51.799 Farm Animal Welfare
- Web Of Science research areas
- Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science
- Food Science & Technology
- ESI research areas
- Agricultural Sciences