Logo image
Ranking biodiversity risk factors using expert groups – Treating linguistic uncertainty and documenting epistemic uncertainty
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Ranking biodiversity risk factors using expert groups – Treating linguistic uncertainty and documenting epistemic uncertainty

S.J. Metcalf and K.J. Wallace
Biological Conservation, Vol.162, pp.1-8
2013
pdf
biodiversity_risk_factors.pdfDownloadView
Author’s Version Open Access
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Sound planning is vital to ensure effective management of biodiversity, particularly where there is a high risk that management goals may not be achieved. This is the case at Toolibin Lake, an internationally recognised wetland, where changed hydrology as a result of agricultural development has detrimentally affected the quality and quantity of water entering the lake. Although management actions have slowed or halted degradation of the lake's biological assets, goals have not been fully achieved and management is under review. To rank the hydrological risk factors threatening the lake's biota as a foundation for more detailed planning, a structured elicitation process was used with an expert, cross-disciplinary group. Techniques used were explicitly aimed at minimising and documenting uncertainty. These included calibration questions to assess the accuracy of experts, and tightly specified goals and terms to minimise vagueness, ambiguity and redundancy. Surface water salinity, groundwater salinity and drought were the only factors identified as having a high probability of causing goal failure. Importantly, the majority of risk factors were evaluated as having a low probability of causing goal failure, enabling these factors to be rapidly eliminated from short-term consideration. The experts, acting anonymously when estimating probabilities, varied considerably in the assessment of one risk. This underlines the importance of rigorous processes to identify knowledge gaps and assess the likelihood that proposed management will be successful. The elicitation process provided low cost, rapid assessment of large numbers of risk factors with explicit assessment of uncertainty.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#13 Climate Action
#14 Life Below Water
#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Metrics

270 File views/ downloads
173 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
3.40 Forestry
3.40.195 Biodiversity Conservation
Web Of Science research areas
Biodiversity Conservation
Ecology
Environmental Sciences
ESI research areas
Environment/Ecology
Logo image