Logo image
Reduction of species identification errors in surveys of marine wildlife abundance utilising unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs)
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Reduction of species identification errors in surveys of marine wildlife abundance utilising unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs)

E. Bigal, O. Galili, I. van Rijn, M. Rosso, C. Cleguer, A. Hodgson, A. Scheinin and D. Tchernov
Remote Sensing, Vol.14(16), Article 4118
2022
pdf
UAVs.pdfDownloadView
Published (Version of Record)CC BY V4.0 Open Access
url
Free to Read *No subscription requiredView

Abstract

The advent of unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) has enhanced our capacity to survey wildlife abundance, yet new protocols are still required for collecting, processing, and analysing image-type observations. This paper presents a methodological approach to produce informative priors on species misidentification probabilities based on independent experiments. We performed focal follows of known dolphin species and distributed our imagery amongst 13 trained observers. Then, we investigated the effects of reviewer-related variables and image attributes on the accuracy of species identification and level of certainty in observations. In addition, we assessed the number of reviewers required to produce reliable identification using an agreement-based framework compared with the majority rule approach. Among-reviewer variation was an important predictor of identification accuracy, regardless of previous experience. Image resolution and sea state exhibited the most pronounced effects on the proportion of correct identifications and the reviewers’ mean level of confidence. Agreement-based identification resulted in substantial data losses but retained a broader range of image resolutions and sea states than the majority rule approach and produced considerably higher accuracy. Our findings suggest a strong dependency on reviewer-related variables and image attributes, which, unless considered, may compromise identification accuracy and produce unreliable estimators of abundance.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#14 Life Below Water
#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Metrics

37 File views/ downloads
50 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
3.35 Zoology & Animal Ecology
3.35.274 Wildlife Ecology
Web Of Science research areas
Environmental Sciences
Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
Imaging Science & Photographic Technology
Remote Sensing
ESI research areas
Geosciences
Logo image