Logo image
Reevaluating evidence on myopic loss aversion: aggregate patterns versus individual choices
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Reevaluating evidence on myopic loss aversion: aggregate patterns versus individual choices

P.R. Blavatskyy and G. Pogrebna
Theory and Decision, Vol.68(1-2), pp.159-171
2010
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Investors who are more willing to accept risks when evaluating their investments less frequently are said to exhibit myopic loss aversion (MLA). Several recent experimental studies found that, on average, subjects bet significantly higher amounts on a risky lottery when they observe only a cumulative outcome of several realizations of the lottery (long evaluation period). In this article, we reexamine these empirical findings by analyzing individual rather than aggregate choice patterns. The behavior of the majority of subjects is inconsistent with the hypothesis of MLA: they bet an intermediate fraction of their initial endowment and these bets, on average, are not significantly different across two treatments with short and long evaluation period. We discuss several alternative explanations of this finding, including the Fechner model of random errors and the financial asset pricing model.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#1 No Poverty
#2 Zero Hunger
#13 Climate Action

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.122 Economic Theory
6.122.1287 Risk Preferences
Web Of Science research areas
Economics
Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods
ESI research areas
Economics & Business
Logo image