Logo image
Reply to commentary by R Duggleby (2019)
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Reply to commentary by R Duggleby (2019)

E.J. Steele, S. Al-Mufti, K.A. Augustyn, R. Chandrajith, J.P. Coghlan, S.G. Coulson, S. Ghosh, M. Gillman, R.M. Gorczynski, B. Klyce, …
Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Vol.141, pp.74-78
2019
pdf
commentary.pdfDownloadView
Published (Version of Record) Open Access
url
Free to Read *No subscription requiredView

Abstract

Duggleby (2018) has made a numerical analysis of some aspects of the wide range of phenomena we reviewed in Steele et al. (2018) and asserted " .that panspermia as proposed by Steele et al. (2018) is extremely implausible.” It seems to us that Duggleby has based his viewpoint on a quite narrow and specific model of Panspermia which he supposes to be active in the cosmos. Here we address both his conclusions and his numerical analysis. Our response therefore will be at two levels, his specific analysis and his general conclusions. In the specific section below we show that while Duggleby's numerical analysis appears in part correct it is, in the final analysis, quite irrelevant to Cosmic Panspermia. In the general response which follows we address his unsupported conclusion throughout his critique, namely that … " none of the examples mentioned by Steele et al. (2018) is decisive enough to allow no other explanation."

Details

Metrics

124 File views/ downloads
135 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
2 Chemistry
2.170 Nucleic Acids Chemistry
2.170.1483 Origin Of Life
Web Of Science research areas
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Biophysics
ESI research areas
Biology & Biochemistry
Logo image