Journal article
Resilience in ecology: Abstraction, distraction, or where the action is?
Biological Conservation, Vol.177, pp.43-51
2014
Abstract
Increasingly, the success of management interventions aimed at biodiversity conservation are viewed as being dependent on the ‘resilience’ of the system. Although the term ‘resilience’ is increasingly used by policy makers and environmental managers, the concept of ‘resilience’ remains vague, varied and difficult to quantify. Here we clarify what this concept means from an ecological perspective, and how it can be measured and applied to ecosystem management. We argue that thresholds of disturbance are central to measuring resilience. Thresholds are important because they offer a means to quantify how much disturbance an ecosystem can absorb before switching to another state, and so indicate whether intervention might be necessary to promote the recovery of the pre-disturbance state. We distinguish between helpful resilience, where resilience helps recovery, and unhelpful resilience where it does not, signalling the presence of a threshold and the need for intervention. Data to determine thresholds are not always available and so we consider the potential for indices of functional diversity to act as proxy measures of resilience. We also consider the contributions of connectivity and scale to resilience and how to incorporate these factors into management. We argue that linking thresholds to functional diversity indices may improve our ability to predict the resilience of ecosystems to future, potentially novel, disturbances according to their spatial and temporal scales of influence. Throughout, we provide guidance for the application of the resilience concept to ecosystem management. In doing so, we confirm its usefulness for improving biodiversity conservation in our rapidly changing world.
Details
- Title
- Resilience in ecology: Abstraction, distraction, or where the action is?
- Authors/Creators
- R.J. Standish (Author/Creator)R.J. Hobbs (Author/Creator)M.M. Mayfield (Author/Creator)B.T. Bestelmeyer (Author/Creator)K.N. Suding (Author/Creator)L.L. Battaglia (Author/Creator)V. Eviner (Author/Creator)C.V. Hawkes (Author/Creator)V.M. Temperton (Author/Creator)V.A. Cramer (Author/Creator)J.A. Harris (Author/Creator)J.L. Funk (Author/Creator)P.A. Thomas (Author/Creator)
- Publication Details
- Biological Conservation, Vol.177, pp.43-51
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Identifiers
- 991005542403207891
- Copyright
- © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
- Murdoch Affiliation
- Murdoch University
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Metrics
70 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Citation topics
- 3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
- 3.40 Forestry
- 3.40.86 Plant Communities
- Web Of Science research areas
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- ESI research areas
- Environment/Ecology