Journal article
Rolling back the bureaucracies of ethics review
Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol.39(8), pp.525-526
2012
Abstract
Dyck and Allen's criticisms of current systems of governance are well founded, at least in some jurisdictions. Their desire to halt the expansion and intensification of research ethics governance is to be applauded. However, their listed categories of research to be exempted from mandatory review may not create a better system.
Details
- Title
- Rolling back the bureaucracies of ethics review
- Authors/Creators
- M. Israel (Author/Creator)
- Publication Details
- Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol.39(8), pp.525-526
- Publisher
- BMJ Publishing Group
- Identifiers
- 991005544757707891
- Murdoch Affiliation
- Murdoch University
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Metrics
22 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Citation topics
- 1 Clinical & Life Sciences
- 1.155 Medical Ethics
- 1.155.598 Clinical Research Ethics
- Web Of Science research areas
- Ethics
- Medical Ethics
- Social Issues
- Social Sciences, Biomedical
- ESI research areas
- Social Sciences, general