Logo image
Science, principles and forest management: a response to Abbott and Christensen
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Science, principles and forest management: a response to Abbott and Christensen

M.C. Calver, R.J. Hobbs, P. Horwitz and A.R. Main
Australian Forestry, Vol.59(1), pp.1-6
1996
pdf
Published_Version.pdfDownloadView
Published (Version of Record) Open Access

Abstract

As scientists engaged in research and teaching on the biota and ecosystems of Western Australia, we have been stimulated to respond to a recent paper by Abbott and Christensen 'Application of ecological and evolutionary principles to forest management in Western Australia' (Australian Forestry 57 (3), 109-122). In the light of the considerable emotion and rhetoric generated at present in the debate over management of native forests, Abbott and Christensen's paper had the potential to provide a rational basis for this important issue and to set the tone for reasoned and informed debate in all venues. Regrettably, this paper appears to contain fundamental flaws in logic, as well as in its choice and discussion of principles, and fails to live up to the promise of its title. Our concerns about the paper are substantial, making concise rebuttal difficult, and are presented under five broad headings. 1. Building a straw man. 2. Logical inconsistencies and misrepresentations. 3. Principles of platitudes. 4. Alternative interpretations. 5. Indicators of ecologically good condition of jarrah and karri forest.

Details

Metrics

635 File views/ downloads
69 Record Views
Logo image