Selecting from the fisheries managers’ tool-box: Recreational fishers’ views of stock enhancement and other management options

James R. Tweedley; Clara Obregón; Sarah J. Beukes; Neil R. Loneragan; Michael Hughes

doi:10.3390/fishes8090460

Back

Selecting from the fisheries managers’ tool-box: Recreational fishers’ views of stock enhancement and other management options

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Selecting from the fisheries managers’ tool-box: Recreational fishers’ views of stock enhancement and other management options

James R. Tweedley, Clara Obregón, Sarah J. Beukes, Neil R. Loneragan and Michael Hughes

Fishes, Vol.8(9), 460

2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8090460

Files and links (1)

pdf

Selecting from the Fisheries Managers’ Tool-Box - Recreational Fishers’ Views of Stock Enhancement and Other Management Options2.40 MBDownload View

Published (Version of Record)CC BY V4.0, Open Access

Abstract

As recreational fishers act relatively autonomously, management relies heavily on voluntary compliance. Therefore, understanding fishers’ views on management options can be beneficial. This study used a two-phase approach of face-to-face interviews and subsequent online questionnaires to evaluate recreational fishers’ salient views on issues affecting the Blue Swimmer Crab (Portunus armatus) and Black Bream (Acanthopagrus butcheri) fisheries in Western Australia as well as current and potential management arrangements, including stock enhancement. The strength and heterogeneity of views were also determined. Minimum size limits were mainly considered acceptable or very acceptable, with restricting recreational fishing and spatial closures the least supported management options for both species, in addition to maximum size limits for crabs. These views were not always consistent across fishing locations for each species and among types of crab fishers, indicating heterogeneity in views. Stocking was the most acceptable of the management measures not already utilised for crabs and among the most popular for bream fisheries. Recreational fishers of both species believed stock enhancement could have strong positive outcomes for the abundance of their target species and increase their subsequent catches. They also recognized that some negative outcomes, e.g., increased fishing pressure and environmental issues, might occur but considered them unlikely.

Details

Title: Selecting from the fisheries managers’ tool-box: Recreational fishers’ views of stock enhancement and other management options
Authors/Creators: James R. Tweedley - Murdoch University, Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems
Clara Obregón - Murdoch University
Sarah J. Beukes - Murdoch University
Neil R. Loneragan - Murdoch University, Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems
Michael Hughes - Murdoch University, Centre for Terrestrial Ecosystem Science and Sustainability
Publication Details: Fishes, Vol.8(9), 460
Identifiers: 991005606967207891
Copyright: © 2023 by the authors
Murdoch Affiliation: Harry Butler Institute; School of Environmental and Conservation Sciences
Language: English
Resource Type: Journal article

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

Source: InCites

Metrics

5 File views/ downloads

95 Record Views

2 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types: Domestic collaboration
Citation topics: 3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology; 3.2 Marine Biology; 3.2.92 Fisheries Ecology
Web Of Science research areas: Fisheries; Marine & Freshwater Biology
ESI research areas: Plant & Animal Science