Logo image
Sequential hydrotalcite precipitation, microbial sulfate reduction and in situ hydrogen sulfide removal for neutral mine drainage treatment
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Sequential hydrotalcite precipitation, microbial sulfate reduction and in situ hydrogen sulfide removal for neutral mine drainage treatment

Ka Yu Cheng, C. Rubina Acuña, A.H. Kaksonen, Graeme Esslemont and Grant B. Douglas
The science of the total environment, Vol.926, 171537
2024
pdf
Published7.49 MBDownloadView
CC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open Access

Abstract

This study proposed and examined a new process flowsheet for treating neutral mine drainage (NMD) from an open-pit gold mine. The process consisted of three sequential stages: (1) in-situ hydrotalcite (HT) precipitation; (2) low-cost carbon substrate driven microbial sulfate reduction; and (3) ferrosol reactive barrier for removing biogenic dissolved hydrogen sulfide (H2S). For concept validation, laboratory-scale columns were established and operated for a 140-days period with key process performance parameters regularly measured. At the end, solids recovered from various depths of the ferrosol column were analysed for elemental composition and mineral phases. Prokaryotic microbial communities in various process locations were characterised using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results showed that the Stage 1 HT-treatment substantially removed a range of elements (As, B, Ba, Ca, F, Zn, Si, and U) in the NMD, but not nitrate or sulfate. The Stage 2 sulfate reducing bioreactor (SRB) packed with 70 % (v/v) Eucalyptus woodchip, 1 % (w/v) ground (<1 mm) dried Typha biomass, and 10 % (w/v) NMD-pond sediment facilitated complete nitrate removal and stable sulfate removal of ca. 50 % (50 g-SO4 m−3 d−1), with an average H2S generation rate of 10 g-H2S m−3d−1. The H2S-removal performance of the Stage 3 ferrosol column was compared with a synthetic amorphous Fe-oxyhydroxide-amended sand control column. Although both columns facilitated excellent (95–100 %) H2S removal, the ferrosol enabled an extra 44 % sulfate reduction in the SRB effluent, leading to an overall sulfate removal of ca. 100 %. In contrast, the control column only enabled a further 10 % reduction, giving an overall sulfate removal of 56 %. Overall, the process successfully eliminated a range of metal/metalloid contaminants, nitrate, sulfate (2500 mg-SO4 L−1 in the NMD to <10 mg-SO4 L−1 in the final effluent) and H2S (>95 % removal). Further optimisation is required to minimise release of ferrous iron from the ferrosol barrier into the final effluent.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#6 Clean Water and Sanitation

Metrics

3 File views/ downloads
26 Record Views
Logo image