Logo image
Should Google Scholar be used for benchmarking against the professoriate in education?
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Should Google Scholar be used for benchmarking against the professoriate in education?

M.K. Merga, S. Mat Roni and S. Mason
Scientometrics, Vol.125, pp.2505-2522
2020
pdf
GoogleScholar.pdfDownloadView
Published (Version of Record) Open Access
url
Free to Read *No subscription requiredView

Abstract

In the neoliberal environment of contemporary academia, an individual’s research rankings and outputs can shape their career security and progression. When applying for ongoing employment and promotional opportunities, academics may benchmark their performance against that of superior colleagues to demonstrate their performance in relation to their discipline. The H-index and citation rates are commonly used to quantify the value of an academic’s work, and they can be used comparatively for benchmarking purposes. The focus of this paper is to critically consider if Google Scholar be used for benchmarking against the professoriate in education, by weighting up issues of data reliability and participation. The Google Scholar profiles of full professors at top ranked universities in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States of America are analysed to explore how widespread Google Scholar use is in the education professoriate. Quartiles of impact are established in relation to H-index, with exploration of how gender is distributed across these quartiles. Limitations of using Google Scholar data are highlighted through a taxonomy of quality confounders, and the utility of Google Scholar as a legitimate tool for benchmarking against the professoriate in education is strongly challenged. As metrics continue to rise in their importance for academics’ job security and promotional prospects, reliance on metrics of dubious quality and uneven participation must be questioned.

Details

Metrics

103 File views/ downloads
124 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.238 Bibliometrics, Scientometrics & Research Integrity
6.238.166 Bibliometrics
Web Of Science research areas
Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications
Information Science & Library Science
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image