Logo image
Signaling or not-signaling: Variation in vulnerability and defense tactics of armored ground crickets (Acanthoplus Speiseri: Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Hetrodinae)
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Signaling or not-signaling: Variation in vulnerability and defense tactics of armored ground crickets (Acanthoplus Speiseri: Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Hetrodinae)

P.W. Bateman and P.A. Fleming
Journal of Insect Behavior, Vol.26(1), pp.14-22
2013
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Male Orthoptera singing from exposed perches are at risk from acoustically- and visually-hunting predators. The defensive reactions of armored ground crickets (Acanthoplus speiseri) include falling silent, dropping from their perch, alarm stridulation and autohaemorrhaging. Male and female ground crickets show different reactivity (i. e. the number or intensity of defense tactics used) to predation, depending on level of exposure: calling males were more reactive when approached during daylight, compared with in the dark. During daylight, calling males were more reactive than silent, cryptic, males and females. The level of response presumably reflected the riskiness of the individual's behavior and situation at that time. Plasticity of response to predation allows individuals to balance risky behavior (i. e. acoustic signaling from exposed perches) by being more reactive to potential threats.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
3.35 Zoology & Animal Ecology
3.35.434 Sexual Selection
Web Of Science research areas
Entomology
ESI research areas
Plant & Animal Science
Logo image