Files and links (1)
CC BY V4.0, Open Access
Journal article
Socio-economic assessment of dog population management systems: a scoping review
Frontiers in veterinary science, Vol.12, 1519913
2025
PMID: 39902170
Abstract
Introduction: Dog Population Management (DPM) systems primarily aim to reduce the free-roaming dog population, improve the health and welfare of humans and dogs, and foster their peaceful coexistence. A key challenge to resource allocation and evidence-based policy making in DPM is the rare evaluation of the associated socio-economic impacts. This scoping review identifies, maps, and summarizes published parameters and methods on the socio-economic aspect of DPM systems.
Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and with a protocol registered on the Open Science Framework, this review explores (i) types of DPM services, (ii) types of parameters (intervention, impact, monetized, or non-monetized), (iii) methodological approaches (such as cost–benefit or cost-effectiveness analysis), and (iv) gaps and challenges in socio-economic DPM assessments. Relevant publications were identified through a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science.
Results: Our review identified 14 out of more than 7,200 studies indicating the limitation of socio-economic data associated with DPM systems. The studies revealed diverse approaches to DPM, sterilization being the most frequently used service, often combined with vaccination and community awareness. Culling was also used by several studies as a DPM intervention, though considered unethical. The review highlighted a range of intervention, impact, and monetary parameters to evaluate the economics of DPM systems, demonstrating the complexity and varied scope of the services. Varied categorizations of the dog population were observed, making comparative evaluation challenging. Economic methods such as cost–benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses were observed, identifying several associated economic metrics. Studies highlighted gaps mostly related to data availability and accessibility.
Conclusion: The limitations of socio-economic data arise from a lack of standardized methodologies across regions and contexts and limited data collection efforts. Prioritizing systematic collection of data on costs, benefits and social impacts allows for a more robust analysis of DPM systems. Developing tools and standardized reporting methods would further facilitate consistent evaluation of impacts, efficient resource allocation and evidence-based policy making to implement the most cost-effective DPM systems.
Details
- Title
- Socio-economic assessment of dog population management systems: a scoping review
- Authors/Creators
- Rabina Ghimire - University of ZurichParimala Mohanty - Indian Institute of Technology GuwahatiElly Hiby - International Centre for Advanced Materials (United Kingdom)Andrew Larkins - Murdoch University, School of Medical, Molecular and Forensic SciencesSalome Dürr - University of BernSonja Hartnack - University of Zurich
- Publication Details
- Frontiers in veterinary science, Vol.12, 1519913
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media S.A.
- Number of pages
- 13
- Grant note
- International Companion Animal Management (ICAM) CoalitionSwiss National Science Foundation (SNSF): IZSTZ0_208430
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding for this study has been provided by International Companion Animal Management (ICAM) Coalition and the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) under the eRabies surveillance -a way forward to rabies elimination in Uganda (IZSTZ0_208430). The funding organization provided full independence and did not influence the research direction.
- Identifiers
- 991005741584107891
- Copyright
- © 2025 Ghimire et al.
- Murdoch Affiliation
- School of Medical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Metrics
265 File views/ downloads
22 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Citation topics
- 1 Clinical & Life Sciences
- 1.104 Virology - General
- 1.104.1816 Rabies
- Web Of Science research areas
- Veterinary Sciences
- ESI research areas
- Plant & Animal Science