Authoritarian statism class conflict crisis of social reproduction Indonesia oligarchy
This rejoinder to Mudhoffir (Citation2026) identifies three key theoretical points of disagreement in the response to our commentary on Indonesian protests of 2025 (Wijaya and Jayasuriya Citation2026). First, the “authoritarian continuity thesis” advanced by our critics misses the way in which the “rule of capital” is organised within the state apparatus. The response to our article rests on an instrumentalist reading of the Indonesian state, which is contrasted to a more structural understanding set out in our 2026 commentary. Second, this perspective enables a better comprehension of the shifts in the form of authoritarian political regimes in response to a variety of often overlapping crises. Third, protests must be understood not simply as a set of grievances about elite impunity but signify a fundamental shift in the structure of the working or labouring class, which is itself the product of capitalist transformation over the last decades. Here, it is contended that these conflicts now find expression in new forms of politics over access to means of social reproduction.
Details
Title
State, Capital, and the Crisis of Social Reproduction in Indonesia: A Rejoinder
Authors/Creators
Trissia Wijaya - The University of Melbourne
Kanishka Jayasuriya - Murdoch University
Publication Details
Journal of contemporary Asia, Early Access
Publisher
Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.