Journal article
Strictly Confidential? Integrity and the Disclosure of Criminological and Socio-Legal Research
British Journal of Criminology, Vol.44(5), pp.715-740
2004
Abstract
When people allow researchers to investigate them, they often negotiate terms for the agreement. Participants in research may, for example, consent on the basis that the information obtained about them will be used only by the researchers and only in particular ways. The information is private and is voluntarily offered to the researcher in confidence. Researchers can justify protecting confidentiality by appealing to consequentialist-, rights- or fidelity-based arguments. Failure to respect confidentiality might not only affect one research project, but could have a ‘chilling effect’ on all criminological research. However, various researchers working in criminology, socio–legal studies and related fields have come under institutional, legal, physical and ethical pressures to disclose confidential information. They have been subpoenaed, imprisoned and have faced threats from armed drug dealers. To protect their sources, they have lied to correctional authorities, prosecutors and police (as well as to armed drug dealers). Drawing on an international literature, I examine some of the legal and methodological measures that researchers have taken to protect data, as well as some of the rationales that might justify disclosing information given in confidence by research participants.
Details
- Title
- Strictly Confidential? Integrity and the Disclosure of Criminological and Socio-Legal Research
- Authors/Creators
- M. Israel (Author/Creator) - The University of Western Australia
- Publication Details
- British Journal of Criminology, Vol.44(5), pp.715-740
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Identifiers
- 991005541666307891
- Copyright
- © 2004 the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD)
- Murdoch Affiliation
- Murdoch University
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
Metrics
36 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Citation topics
- 6 Social Sciences
- 6.146 Anthropology
- 6.146.1622 Autoethnography
- Web Of Science research areas
- Criminology & Penology
- ESI research areas
- Social Sciences, general