Journal article
The need for pluralism in landscape models: a reply to Dunn and Majer
Oikos, Vol.116(8), pp.1419-1421
08/2007
Abstract
Dunn and Majer discuss limitations of the continuum model proposed by Fischer and Lindenmayer and describe a new patch-based model. We argue that a range of landscape models are required to solve different problems and meet particular objectives of land management or conservation. The key issue is not whether one type of model is superior to another, but rather: what are the particular strengths and limitations of a particular model? And, given these, under what circumstances will a particular model be most appropriate? The primary value of the continuum model is that it provides a strong theoretical foundation for the management of landscape heterogeneity in addition to the protection of large patches of native vegetation.
Details
- Title
- The need for pluralism in landscape models: a reply to Dunn and Majer
- Authors/Creators
- D.B. Lindenmayer (Author/Creator)J. Fischer (Author/Creator)R. Hobbs (Author/Creator)
- Publication Details
- Oikos, Vol.116(8), pp.1419-1421
- Publisher
- Blackwell Publishing Inc.
- Identifiers
- 991005545348407891
- Copyright
- © Oikos.
- Murdoch Affiliation
- School of Environmental Science
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Metrics
22 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Citation topics
- 3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
- 3.40 Forestry
- 3.40.195 Biodiversity Conservation
- Web Of Science research areas
- Ecology
- ESI research areas
- Environment/Ecology