Journal article
The pandemic and the politics of Australian research governance
Higher Education Research & Development, Vol.42(3), pp.679-693
2023
Abstract
Following the 1989 unified higher education reforms, the Australian academic research system was built upon the notion of depoliticisation (i.e., keeping the political character of decision at one remove from governance) to govern the contradiction between research credibility and governmental economic priorities. The article argues that the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the tension between independent research and governmental economic priorities. The pandemic, also, weakened university autonomy via the closure of the national border, reducing overseas student fees, a significant source of research funding. The article maintains that the conservative Morrison government used the opportunity to politicise research around commercialisation and national sovereignty. The argument being that the pandemic exposed Australia’s research and development (R&D) dependence and with it the question of industrial sovereignty, prompting the government to couple academic research to industry policy. Secondly, the pandemic reinforced the conservative government’s aim to concentrate research in selected commercial areas and to exert this priority on to the research funding agency, the Australian Research Council (ARC). Lastly, the article contends that the COVID pandemic, originating in Wuhan, intensified the Morrison government’s geopolitical concerns over China, and this disquiet flowed into research policy, which problematised research collaboration with Chinese researchers.
Details
- Title
- The pandemic and the politics of Australian research governance
- Authors/Creators
- G. McCarthy (Author/Creator)K. Jayasuriya (Author/Creator)
- Publication Details
- Higher Education Research & Development, Vol.42(3), pp.679-693
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Identifiers
- 991005543772807891
- Murdoch Affiliation
- Murdoch Business School
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Metrics
65 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Citation topics
- 6 Social Sciences
- 6.11 Education & Educational Research
- 6.11.1255 International Education
- Web Of Science research areas
- Education & Educational Research
- ESI research areas
- Social Sciences, general