Logo image
The politics of public–private partnerships: State–capital relations and spatial fixes in Indonesia and the Philippines
Journal article   Peer reviewed

The politics of public–private partnerships: State–capital relations and spatial fixes in Indonesia and the Philippines

T. Wijaya and A. Camba
Territory, Politics, Governance
2021
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

The literature on public–private partnerships (PPPs) often portrays infrastructure construction as a depoliticized and technocratic exercise about efficiency and cost-effectiveness. In contrast to these works, we contend the political and economic elites along with their transnational allies – the congruence of state–capital – recycle PPPs in constructing their spatial fixes, guaranteeing profits and passing risks from the private sector bidder onto the public as a whole. We suggest that PPPs lie within the intertwining processes of ‘Development’ and ‘development’, which are articulations of neoliberalism in its latest and most sophisticated iteration. Across different regimes, PPPs’ processes and mechanisms reflect various governance structures and hybrid forms of state–capital relations. Examining Indonesia and the Philippines, we empirically demonstrate how state–capital forces reproduced PPPs to simultaneously accommodate degrees of state intervention and the private sector’s desire for a spatial fix. We illustrate that administrations withinboth countries have sought to rebuild the PPPs as institutions of technocratic fixation while obscuring the political underpinnings of the risk appropriation – transforming the state’s responsibility in infrastructure and foregrounding spatial fixes for capital. The article concludes with a call to unpack the variegated character of PPPs.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.86 Human Geography
6.86.149 Urban Politics
Web Of Science research areas
Geography
Political Science
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image