Logo image
The role of skin testing, drug challenge and IFN-γ ELISpot in delayed hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast media
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The role of skin testing, drug challenge and IFN-γ ELISpot in delayed hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast media

Ana Maria Copaescu, Kyra Y L Chua, Effie Mouhtouris, Natasha E Holmes, Moneerah AlGassim, Ibtihal Al Otaibi, Florian Stehlin, Ghislaine A C Isabwe, Christos Tsoukas, Jean-Francois Toupin, …
Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology, Vol.21(1), 35
2025
PMID: 40813693
pdf
Published1.43 MBDownloadView
CC BY V4.0 Open Access

Abstract

Ex vivo diagnostic tools Delayed hypersensitivity reactions In vivo diagnostic tools Maculopapular exanthema Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms Iodinated contrast media
Background The use of in vivo and ex vivo diagnostic tools for delayed hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) associated with iodinated contrast media (ICM) is currently ill-defined. Objective To evaluate the role of in vivo and ex vivo diagnostic tools for DHRs occurring >6 h following intravenous low-osmolality ICM. Methods We conducted a prospective, multicenter, international cohort study. The patients were recruited from two tertiary care adult allergy clinics, Austin Health, Australia and the McGill University Health Centre, Canada. Eligible participants were adults who reported a DHR after receiving ICM. In vivo testing (skin testing and intravenous challenge) was performed to identify an alternative agent. Ex vivo testing using interferon-γ enzyme-linked ImmunoSpot assay was performed in four Australian patients to explore its diagnostic performance. Results The culprit ICM was identified by dIDT in 17/20 (85%) while in 3/20 (15%) a challenge was necessary to confirm delayed hypersensitivity. All patients with a positive dIDT to iohexol were positive to iodixanol (15/15; 100%) while 3/4 (75%), 3/4 (75%), 4/6 (67%), and 3/5 (60%) were positive to iopromide, ioversol, iopamidol, and iobitridol, respectively. Overall, 7/20 (35%) patients tolerated a challenge with an alternative ICM. The IFN-γ release assay was negative for the implicated ICM in 4 patients with confirmed DHR through a positive dIDT. Conclusion dIDT allowed confirmation of T cell-mediated allergy to the implicated ICM in 85% of patients with a strong clinical suspicion of DHR and identification of non-cross-reactive ICM in 35% of patients. The IFN-y ELISpot was not useful in the four patients tested.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

11 File views/ downloads
17 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.265 Dermatology - Skin Allergies
1.265.2004 Iopamidol
Web Of Science research areas
Allergy
Immunology
ESI research areas
Immunology
Logo image