Journal article
The role of uncertainty and subjective influences on consequence assessment by aquatic biosecurity experts
Journal of Environmental Management, Vol.127, pp.103-113
2013
Abstract
Expert judgement is often used to mitigate the knowledge gaps that limit understanding of aquatic non-indigenous species (ANS) impacts (consequences) to environmental, economic, social, cultural and human health values. To understand how this uncertainty may affect expert decision making, we explored the presence and effects of uncertainty on consequence assessment for 10 ANS by scientists and managers. We hypothesized species' distribution, taxonomy and impact type will affect assessment magnitude. These hypotheses were partially supported. We also hypothesized a difference in the relationship between consequence magnitude and uncertainty, based on assessor group. This set of hypotheses was not supported, as all group assessments had a significant negative correlation between consequence and uncertainty. Both scientists and managers assigned lower consequence when faced with knowledge gaps and other forms of uncertainty. This aligns with an “innocent until proven guilty” or hindsight approach, as opposed to a “guilty until proven innocent” or precaution approach. Based on these outcomes, the experts appeared to make decisions in violation of both the maximin principle and precaution, instead using a heuristic approach. We suggest several management strategies to prevent biases against environmental protection that occur due to use of the hindsight approach.
Details
- Title
- The role of uncertainty and subjective influences on consequence assessment by aquatic biosecurity experts
- Authors/Creators
- A.D. Davidson (Author/Creator) - Australian Maritime CollegeM.L. Campbell (Author/Creator) - Australian Maritime CollegeC.L. Hewitt (Author/Creator) - Australian Maritime College
- Publication Details
- Journal of Environmental Management, Vol.127, pp.103-113
- Publisher
- Academic Press
- Identifiers
- 991005543216307891
- Copyright
- © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
- Murdoch Affiliation
- Murdoch University
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Metrics
32 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Citation topics
- 6 Social Sciences
- 6.153 Climate Change
- 6.153.742 Science Communication
- Web Of Science research areas
- Environmental Sciences
- ESI research areas
- Environment/Ecology