Logo image
Back
The social must be limited: Some problems with Foucault's approach to modern positive power
Journal article   Peer reviewed

The social must be limited: Some problems with Foucault's approach to modern positive power

G. Wickham
Journal of Sociology, Vol.44(1), pp.29-44
2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783307085806
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Focusing on Foucault's distinction between an older, superseded model - the juridical/sovereignty model - and a newer one - which he refers to by a variety of names, such as disciplinary bio-power, art of government and governmentality - this article seeks, first, to demonstrate that his account of modern positive power is an unsatisfactory explanation of this type of power. It does this by contrasting it with an account that locates modern positive power in a set of early modern limiting mechanisms, mechanisms that actually produced the modern limited domain of the social, the principal object of sociology, initially only as a domain of respite from raging religious violence. On the back of this argument, the article also seeks to show that Foucault's account is politically problematic, in two ways: one, that it is rooted in a tradition of unengaged 'critique' and, two, that it is tied, albeit inadvertently, to totalitarianism.

Details

Metrics

63 Record Views
4 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
10 Arts & Humanities
10.126 Philosophy
10.126.2158 Hobbesian Political Thought
Web Of Science research areas
Sociology
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image