Logo image
The transport energy trade-off: Fuel-efficient traffic versus fuel-efficient cities
Journal article   Peer reviewed

The transport energy trade-off: Fuel-efficient traffic versus fuel-efficient cities

P.W.G. Newman and J.R. Kenworthy
Transportation Research Part A: General, Vol.22(3), pp.163-174
1988
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Improving fuel efficiency in vehicular traffic by increasing average speeds is shown to have a major trade-off through land use changes and modal shifts that result in an overall loss in fuel efficiency for the total urban area. In Perth, even though vehicles in central areas have a 19% lower fuel efficiency than average due to congestion, the central area residents still use 22% less actual fuel on average due to their locational advantages. On the other hand, outer suburban traffic is 12% more efficient than average but residents use 29% more actual fuel. A comparison of 32 world cities confirms that there is a trade-off between fuel-efficient traffic and fuel-efficient cities. The implications for traffic engineering programmes and road funding are discussed.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
4 Electrical Engineering, Electronics & Computer Science
4.183 Transportation
4.183.495 Urban Mobility
Web Of Science research areas
Economics
Transportation
Transportation Science & Technology
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image