Logo image
Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners

G. Edmond, A. Towler, B. Growns, G. Ribeiro, B. Found, D. White, K. Ballantyne, R.A. Searston, M.B. Thompson, J.M. Tangen, …
Science & Justice, Vol.57(2), pp.144-154
2016
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Human factors and their implications for forensic science have attracted increasing levels of interest across criminal justice communities in recent years. Initial interest centred on cognitive biases, but has since expanded such that knowledge from psychology and cognitive science is slowly infiltrating forensic practices more broadly. This article highlights a series of important findings and insights of relevance to forensic practitioners. These include research on human perception, memory, context information, expertise, decision-making, communication, experience, verification, confidence, and feedback. The aim of this article is to sensitise forensic practitioners (and lawyers and judges) to a range of potentially significant issues, and encourage them to engage with research in these domains so that they may adapt procedures to improve performance, mitigate risks and reduce errors. Doing so will reduce the divide between forensic practitioners and research scientists as well as improve the value and utility of forensic science evidence.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Source: InCites

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
2 Chemistry
2.244 Chemometrics
2.244.1784 Forensic Spectroscopy
Web Of Science research areas
Medicine, Legal
Pathology
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image