Logo image
Treating chronic hypoventilation with automatic adjustable versus fixed EPAP Intelligent Volume-Assured Positive Airway Pressure Support (iVAPS): A randomized controlled trial
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Treating chronic hypoventilation with automatic adjustable versus fixed EPAP Intelligent Volume-Assured Positive Airway Pressure Support (iVAPS): A randomized controlled trial

Nigel McArdle, Clare Rea, Stuart King, Kathleen Maddison, Dinesh Ramanan, Sahisha Ketheeswaran, Lisa Erikli, Vanessa Baker, Jeff Armitstead, Glenn Richards, …
Sleep (New York, N.Y.), Vol.40(10)
2017
PMID: 28958052
url
PublishedView
Published (Version of Record)

Abstract

sleep apnea syndromes hypoventilation noninvasive ventilation intermittent positive pressure ventilation volume-assured pressure support
Objectives New noninvasive ventilation (NIV) modes can automatically adjust pressure support settings to deliver effective ventilation in response to varying ventilation demands. It is recommended that fixed expiratory positive airway pressure (FixedEPAP) is determined by attended laboratory polysomnographic (PSG) titration. This study investigated whether automatically determined EPAP (AutoEPAP) was noninferior to FixedEPAP for the control of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) during intelligent volume-assured pressure support (iVAPS) treatment of chronic hypoventilation. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, crossover study, patients with chronic hypoventilation and OSA used iVAPS with AutoEPAP or FixedEPAP over two separate nights of attended PSG. PSG recordings were scored by an independent scorer using American Academy of Sleep Medicine 2012 criteria. Results Twenty-five adults (14 male) with chronic hypoventilation secondary to obesity hypoventilation syndrome (n = 11), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 9), or neuromuscular disease (n = 5), all of whom were on established home NIV therapy, were included (age 57 ± 7 years, NIV for ≥3 months, apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] >5/hour). AutoEPAP was noninferior to FixedEPAP for the primary outcome measure (median [interquartile range] AHI 2.70 [1.70–6.05]/hour vs. 2.40 [0.25–5.95]/hour; p = .86). There were no significant between-mode differences in PSG sleep breathing and sleep quality, or self-reported sleep quality, device comfort, and patient preference. Mean EPAP with the Auto and Fixed modes was 10.8 ± 2.0 and 11.8 ± 3.9 cmH2O, respectively (p = .15). Conclusions In patients with chronic hypoventilation using iVAPS, the AutoEPAP algorithm was noninferior to FixedEPAP over a single night’s therapy.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Industry collaboration
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.137 Sleep Science & Circadian Systems
1.137.382 Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Web Of Science research areas
Clinical Neurology
Neurosciences
ESI research areas
Neuroscience & Behavior
Logo image