Logo image
Treatment approaches to horses with acute diarrhea admitted to referral institutions: A multicenter retrospective study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Treatment approaches to horses with acute diarrhea admitted to referral institutions: A multicenter retrospective study

Diego E Gomez, Jamie J Kopper, David P Byrne, David L Renaud, Angelika Schoster, Bettina Dunkel, Luis G Arroyo, Anna Mykkanen, William F Gilsenan, Tina H Pihl, …
PloS one, Vol.19(11), e0313783
2024
PMID: 39565809
pdf
Published500.42 kBDownloadView
CC BY V4.0 Open Access

Abstract

Acute Disease Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Diarrhea - drug therapy Diarrhea - therapy Diarrhea - veterinary Female Fluid Therapy - methods Horse Diseases - drug therapy Horse Diseases - therapy Horses Male Probiotics - therapeutic use Referral and Consultation Retrospective Studies
Background This study aimed to describe and compare therapeutic approaches for horses with acute diarrhea in different geographic regions worldwide. Methods Clinical information was retrospectively collected from diarrheic horses presented to participating institutions between 2016 and 2020, including fluid therapy on admission, antimicrobial drugs, probiotics, anti-endotoxic medications, anti-inflammatory drugs, gastroprotectants, digital cryotherapy, and toxin-binding agents. Seasonal and geographic differences were investigated. Results 1438 horses from 26 participating hospitals from 5 continents were included. On admission, 65% (926/1419) of horses were administered a fluid bolus. Antimicrobial drugs were administered to 55% (792/1419) within the first 24 hours of admission, with penicillin and gentamicin being the most used combination (25%, 198/792). Horses with leukopenia (OR: 2.264, 95%CI: 1.754 to 2.921; P<0.001) or meeting systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (OR: 2.542, 95%CI: 1.919 to 3.368; P<0.001) had higher odds of being administered antimicrobial drugs. Other treatments administered included probiotics (15%, 215/1438), polymyxin B (13%; 187/1438), pentoxifylline (8%; 118/1438), gastroprotectants (44%; 626/1419), digital cryotherapy (34%; 489/1435), plasma transfusion (13%; 182/1410) and toxin-binding agents (36%; 515/1438). Limitations Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the rationale for treatment decisions was unavailable, and associations with survival could not be evaluated. Conclusions Treatments varied between hospitals from different geographic regions. Prospective clinical trials are required to evaluate the effects of various treatments on survival.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#15 Life on Land

Metrics

5 File views/ downloads
21 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.317 Risk Assessment
6.317.2518 Sustainable Development
Web Of Science research areas
Veterinary Sciences
ESI research areas
Plant & Animal Science
Logo image