Logo image
U and U: The high court reconsiders relocation in the family court
Journal article   Peer reviewed

U and U: The high court reconsiders relocation in the family court

L. Young
University of Western Australian Law Review, Vol.6, pp.241-257
2002
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

In 1999 the High Court took its first look at the vexed issue of relocation in family law matters: what to do when a residence parent wishes to move away, with the child/ren, from a contact parent. In that case, AMS v AIF; AIF v AMS ('AMS'),2 the High Court held (by a majority of 6-1) that the trial Judge had erroneously required the mother to establish she had a 'good reason' for her proposed move from Perth to Darwin. The paramount consideration for any parenting order is the best interests of the child,3 and while a parent's reasons for moving might well be relevant to that inquiry, the case held there is no pre-requisite that a parent establish a compelling reason before the move is permitted...

Details

Metrics

105 Record Views
Logo image