Logo image
Using patient admission characteristics alone to predict mortality of critically ill patients: A comparison of 3 prognostic scores
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Using patient admission characteristics alone to predict mortality of critically ill patients: A comparison of 3 prognostic scores

K.M. Ho, T.A. Williams, Y. Harahsheh and T.L. Higgins
Journal of Critical Care, Vol.31(1), pp.21-25
2016
pdf
using patient admission characteristics.pdfDownloadView
Author’s VersionCC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open Access
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared the performance of 3 admission prognostic scores in predicting hospital mortality. Materials and methods: Patient admission characteristics and hospital outcome of 9549 patients were recorded prospectively. The discrimination and calibration of the predicted risks of death derived from the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS III), Admission Mortality Prediction Model (MPM0 III), and admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and a calibration plot, respectively. Measurements and main results: Of the 9549 patients included in the study, 1276 patients (13.3%) died after intensive care unit admission. Patient admission characteristics were significantly different between the survivors and nonsurvivors. All 3 prognostic scores had a reasonable ability to discriminate between the survivors and nonsurvivors (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for SAPS III, 0.836; MPM0 III, 0.807; admission APACHE, 0.845), with best discrimination in emergency admissions. The SAPS III model had a slightly better calibration and overall performance (slope of calibration curve, 1.03; Brier score, 0.09; Nagelkerke R-2, 0.297) compared to the MPM0 III and admission APACHE II model. Conclusions: All 3 intensive care unit admission prognostic scores had a good ability to predict hospital mortality of critically ill patients, with best discrimination in emergency admissions.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

212 File views/ downloads
65 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.154 Assisted Ventilation
1.154.1088 Intensive Care
Web Of Science research areas
Critical Care Medicine
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image