Logo image
Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis

Y.C. Learmonth, R.W. Motl, B.M. Sandroff, J.H. Pula and D. Cadavid
BMC Neurology, Vol.13, Article number: 37
2013
pdf
PDDS.pdfDownloadView
Published (Version of Record) Open Access
url
Free to Read *No subscription requiredView

Abstract

Background: The Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) is a promising patient-reported outcome (PRO) of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). To date, there is limited evidence regarding the validity of PDDS scores, despite its sound conceptual development and broad inclusion in MS research. This study examined the validity of the PDDS based on (1) the association with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores and (2) the pattern of associations between PDDS and EDSS scores with Functional System (FS) scores as well as ambulatory and other outcomes. Methods: 96 persons with MS provided demographic/clinical information, completed the PDDS and other PROs including the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12), and underwent a neurological examination for generating FS and EDSS scores. Participants completed assessments of cognition, ambulation including the 6-minute walk (6 MW), and wore an accelerometer during waking hours over seven days. Results: There was a strong correlation between EDSS and PDDS scores (ρ = .783). PDDS and EDSS scores were strongly correlated with Pyramidal (ρ = .578 & ρ = .647, respectively) and Cerebellar (ρ = .501 & ρ = .528, respectively) FS scores as well as 6 MW distance (ρ = .704 & ρ = .805, respectively), MSWS-12 scores (ρ = .801 & ρ = .729, respectively), and accelerometer steps/day (ρ = −.740 & ρ = −.717, respectively). Conclusion: This study provides novel evidence supporting the PDDS as valid PRO of disability in MS.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Metrics

94 File views/ downloads
219 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
International collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.203 Neuromuscular Disorders
1.203.147 Multiple Sclerosis
Web Of Science research areas
Clinical Neurology
ESI research areas
Neuroscience & Behavior
Logo image