Logo image
Validity of power settings of the Wahoo KICKR Power Trainer
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Validity of power settings of the Wahoo KICKR Power Trainer

E. K. Zadow, C. M. Kitic, S. S. X. Wu, S. T. Smith and J. W. Fell
International journal of sports physiology and performance, Vol.11(8), pp.1115-1117
2016
PMID: 26915606

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Physiology Science & Technology Sport Sciences
Purpose: To assess the validity of power output settings of the Wahoo KICKR Power Trainer (KICKR) using a dynamic calibration rig (CALRIG) over a range of power outputs and cadences. Methods: Using the KICKR to set power outputs, powers of 100-999 W were assessed at cadences (controlled by the CALRIG) of 80, 90, 100, 110, and 120 rpm. Results: The KICKR displayed accurate measurements of power of 250-700 W at cadences of 80-120 rpm with a bias of -1.1% (95% limits of agreement [LoA] -3.6% to 1.4%). A larger mean bias in power was observed across the full range of power tested, 100-999 W (4.2%, 95% LoA -20.1% to 28.6%), due to larger biases of 100-200 and 750-999 W (4.5%, 95% LoA -2.3% to 11.3%, and 13.0%, 95% LoA -24.4% to 50.3%), respectively. Conclusions: Compared with a CALRIG, the KICKR has acceptable accuracy reporting a small mean bias and narrow LoA in the measurement of power output of 250-700 W at cadences of 80-120 rpm. Caution should be applied by coaches and sports scientists when using the KICKR at power outputs of <200 W and >750 W due to the greater variability in recorded power.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.172 Sports Science
1.172.648 Exercise Physiology
Web Of Science research areas
Physiology
Sport Sciences
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image