Logo image
Variation in health visiting contacts for children in England: Cross-sectional analysis of the 2-2½ year review using administrative data (Community Services Dataset, CSDS)
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Variation in health visiting contacts for children in England: Cross-sectional analysis of the 2-2½ year review using administrative data (Community Services Dataset, CSDS)

Caroline Fraser, Katie Harron, Jane Barlow, Samantha Bennett, Geoffrey Woods, Jenny Shand, Sally Kendall and Jenny Woodman
BMJ open, Vol.12, e053884
2022
PMCID: PMC8867374
PMID: 35193912
pdf
Published1.40 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of Record)CC BY V4.0 Open Access

Abstract

child protection community child health organisation of health services public health
Objective The 2–2½ year universal health visiting review in England is a key time point for assessing child development and promoting school readiness. We aimed to ascertain which children were least likely to receive their 2–2½ year review and whether there were additional non-mandated contacts for children who missed this review. Design, setting, participants Cross-sectional analysis of the 2–2½ year review and additional health visiting contacts for 181 130 children aged 2 in England 2018/2019, stratified by ethnicity, deprivation, safeguarding vulnerability indicator and Looked After Child status. Analysis We used data from 33 local authorities submitting highly complete data on health visiting contacts to the Community Services Dataset. We calculated the percentage of children with a recorded 2–2½ year review and/or any additional health visiting contacts and average number of contacts, by child characteristic. Results The most deprived children were slightly less likely to receive a 2–2½ year review than the least deprived children (72% vs 78%) and Looked After Children much less likely, compared with other children (44% vs 69%). When all additional contacts were included, the pattern was reversed (deprivation) or disappeared (Looked After children). A substantial proportion of all children (24%), children with a ‘safeguarding vulnerability’ (22%) and Looked After children (29%) did not have a record of either a 2–2½ year review or any other face-to-face contact in the year. Conclusions A substantial minority of children aged 2 with known vulnerabilities did not see the health visiting team at all in the year. Some higher need children (eg, deprived and Looked After) appeared to be seeing the health visiting team but not receiving their mandated health review. Further work is needed to establish the reasons for this, and potential solutions. There is an urgent need to improve the quality of national health visiting data.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.72 Obstetrics & Gynecology
1.72.1072 Perinatal Mental Health
Web Of Science research areas
Primary Health Care
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image