Logo image
What conceptions of science communication are espoused by science research funding bodies?
Journal article   Peer reviewed

What conceptions of science communication are espoused by science research funding bodies?

S.E. Palmer and R.A. Schibeci
Public Understanding of Science, Vol.23(5), pp.511-527
2014
url
Link to Published Version *Subscription may be requiredView

Abstract

We examine the conceptions of science communication, especially in relation to "public engagement with science" (PES), evident in the literature and websites of science research funding bodies in Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Oceania, and Africa. The analysis uses a fourfold classification of science communication to situate these conceptions: professional, deficit, consultative and deliberative. We find that all bodies engage in professional communication (within the research community); however, engagement with the broader community is variable. Deficit (information dissemination) models still prevail but there is evidence of movement towards more deliberative, participatory models.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#13 Climate Action

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.153 Climate Change
6.153.742 Science Communication
Web Of Science research areas
Communication
History & Philosophy Of Science
ESI research areas
Social Sciences, general
Logo image