Journal article
Why were there no war crimes trials for the Korean War?
Journal of Global History, Vol.16(2), pp.185-206
2021
Abstract
In the Korean War of 1950-53, U.S. authorities were determined to pursue atrocities perpetrated by North Korean and Communist Chinese forces through legal channels, in keeping with the standards they believed they had set after the Second World War. Yet, their plans foundered in Korea, despite extensive groundwork for prosecutions. Four factors were responsible. First, it was difficult to find reliable evidence and to identify and apprehend suspects. Second, U.S. officials rapidly lost confidence in the idea of prosecuting national leaders. Third, the lack of clear-cut victory in the conflict necessitated a diplomatic solution, which was incompatible with war crimes trials. Fourth, the moral standing of the West, and hence its authority to run trials, was undermined by the large number of atrocities committed by the United Nations side. Thus, the U.S. plan for war crimes trials was dropped without fanfare, to be replaced by an anti-Communist propaganda campaign.
Details
- Title
- Why were there no war crimes trials for the Korean War?
- Authors/Creators
- S. Wilson (Author/Creator) - Murdoch University
- Publication Details
- Journal of Global History, Vol.16(2), pp.185-206
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Identifiers
- 991005539973907891
- Copyright
- © 2021 The Authors.
- Murdoch Affiliation
- School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
Metrics
230 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Citation topics
- 6 Social Sciences
- 6.277 Asian Studies
- 6.277.1672 Japanese Cultural Identity
- Web Of Science research areas
- History
- ESI research areas
- Social Sciences, general