Logo image
Does Older Mean Better? Analyses of Boards' Influence on Sustainability Performance
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Does Older Mean Better? Analyses of Boards' Influence on Sustainability Performance

Augustine Donkor, Kwadjo Appiagyei, Sally Mingle Yorke and Ernest Gyapong
Business Strategy and the Environment, Early View
2024

Abstract

board of directors critical mass generational cohort quantile distribution sustainability performance
This study examines the influence of board generational cohorts on firms' sustainability performance (FSP) and the critical mass of directors within the different cohorts that influences FSP. We find that while Boomers have a positive influence on FSP, Traditionalist, GenX and GenY members are less concerned about FSP. Additionally, older cohorts (Traditionalists and Boomers) require three directors to exert their respective influence on FSP, whereas GenX and GenY require two or more and one director, respectively. Furthermore, the presence of Boomers may mitigate the limited focus of other generational cohorts on FSP. By identifying that not all cohorts in the older generation have a positive influence on FSP, that boomers may help mitigate the negative influence of other cohorts and the critical mass for which each cohort establishes an influence, we inform firms and policy makers on the mix of cohorts on the board that may enhance FSP.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

Source: InCites

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.3 Management
6.3.385 Corporate Social Responsibility
Web Of Science research areas
Business
Environmental Studies
Management
ESI research areas
Economics & Business
Logo image