This study examines the impact of overall Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and its pillars on the default probability of Australian-listed firms. Using a panel dataset spanning 2014 to 2022 and applying the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) regression, we find that firms with higher ESG scores exhibit a significantly lower likelihood of default. Disaggregating the ESG components reveals that the Environmental and Social pillars have a negative association with default risk, suggesting a risk-mitigating effect. In contrast, the Governance pillar demonstrates a positive relationship with default probability, which may reflect potential greenwashing behavior or an excessive focus on formal governance mechanisms at the expense of operational and financial performance. Furthermore, the analysis identifies trade credit financing (TCF) as a partial mediator in the ESG–default risk nexus, indicating that firms with stronger ESG profiles rely less on external short-term financing, thereby reducing their default risk. These findings provide valuable insights for corporate management, investors, regulators, and policymakers seeking to enhance financial resilience through sustainable practices.
Details
Title
Exploring Governance Failures in Australia: ESG Pillar-Level Analysis of Default Risk Mediated by Trade Credit Financing
Authors/Creators
Thuong Thi Le
Tanvir Bhuiyan - Murdoch University, College of Business
Thi Le - Murdoch University, College of Business
Ariful Hoque - Murdoch University, College of Business
Publication Details
Journal of Risk and Financial Management, Vol.18(8), 464