Logo image
Intrasexual Selection for Upper Limb Length in Homo sapiens
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Intrasexual Selection for Upper Limb Length in Homo sapiens

Neil R. Caton and David M. G. Lewis
American journal of human biology, Vol.37(2), e70010
2025
PMID: 39969012
pdf
Published447.59 kBDownloadView
CC BY V4.0 Open Access

Abstract

Original
Objectives Sexual selection via contest competition has equipped countless organisms with weaponry in their appendages to overpower their opponents. Here, we tested (1) whether greater upper limb length—measured as span controlling for biacromial width—confers an advantage in contest competition among adult humans, (2) several possible means by which upper limb length might increase success in intrasexual contest competition, and (3) whether, consistent with male–male contest competition creating stronger selection pressures than female–female contest competition, male Homo sapiens have greater upper limb length. Methods We collected fight statistics and facial and body photographs from professional combatants (N = 715) in the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC; Study 1). Sexual dimorphism in upper limb length was then examined via diverse and demographically representative samples from four studies (total N = 6915), from Croatian adolescents and older Singaporean adults to United States Army personnel born across all major world regions (Studies 2a–2d). Results First, we found that greater upper limb length is associated with increased success in intrasexual contest competition, an effect driven by both the capacity to grapple opponents to submission and to knock opponents unconscious (Study 1). Second, we found unequivocal, cross-cultural evidence of unique sexual dimorphism in upper limb length after controlling for allometry: across four studies, men exhibited longer upper limbs than women (Studies 2a–2d). Conclusion Upper limb length may have been shaped by intrasexual selection, with implications across the biological, anthropological, and psychological sciences.

Details

Metrics

5 File views/ downloads
25 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
6 Social Sciences
6.73 Social Psychology
6.73.1369 Evolutionary Psychology
Web Of Science research areas
Anthropology
Biology
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine
Logo image