Journal article
The “appropriate” response to deprivation: Evolutionary and ethical dimensions
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.40, e332
2017
Abstract
Pepper & Nettle use an evolutionary framework to argue that “temporal discounting” is an appropriate response to low socioeconomic status (SES), or deprivation. We suggest some conceptual refinements to their “appropriate-response” perspective, with the hope that it usefully informs future research on and public policy responses to the relationship between deprivation and temporal discounting.
Details
- Title
- The “appropriate” response to deprivation: Evolutionary and ethical dimensions
- Authors/Creators
- C. Lewis (Author/Creator)D.M.G. Lewis (Author/Creator)
- Publication Details
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.40, e332
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Identifiers
- 991005544632107891
- Copyright
- © 2017 Cambridge University Press
- Murdoch Affiliation
- School of Psychology and Exercise Science
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
Metrics
25 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Citation topics
- 6 Social Sciences
- 6.73 Social Psychology
- 6.73.1369 Evolutionary Psychology
- Web Of Science research areas
- Behavioral Sciences
- Neurosciences
- Psychology, Biological
- ESI research areas
- Neuroscience & Behavior