Logo image
Why Keep the LGBTQIA+ Acronym Together – "Wouldn't It Just Be Best to Split the Acronym?
Journal article   Open access

Why Keep the LGBTQIA+ Acronym Together – "Wouldn't It Just Be Best to Split the Acronym?

Kim Andreassen, Bri McKenzie, Julian Chen and Wendy Cumming-Potvin
Journal of Queer and Trans Studies in Education, Vol.3(2), 11
2025
pdf
Published501.02 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of Record) Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Abstract

LGBTQIA+ inclusion queering pedagogy LGBTQIA+ advocacy
Drawing on the authors' reflections after hosting a community launch event that shared outcomes from research about LGBTQIA+ inclusion in K-12 education in Western Australia, this report examines the importance of keeping the LGBTQIA+ acronym together, emphasizing its role in promoting inclusion, intersectionality, and equitable education. Global legislative actions targeting gender-diverse and queer youth, such as recent restrictive laws in the United States, threaten the fundamental right to education and undermine efforts toward achieving the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal 4 of quality education for all. Utilizing relevant education literature, researchers' reflections and introspective questions, this report stressed the interconnectedness of gender, sexuality, and other social identities, arguing that splitting the LGBTQIA+ acronym when doing educational advocacy risks perpetuating exclusion.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#10 Reduced Inequalities

Source: SDGs in the Output

Metrics

21 Record Views
Logo image