Tamara Hourani

Scientific writing is a common challenge for university students, particularly those lacking proficiency in academic English. Despite being routinely evaluated on their understanding of concepts through scientific writing, students are not explicitly taught how to write scientifically. STEM education often prioritises the teaching of concepts and experimental theories, leaving students to independently decipher the expectations of advanced scientific writing at a tertiary level. However, first-year students often encounter difficulties discerning and executing the essential elements of scientific writing. To address this, we developed five high-quality, online interactive modules with the aim to augment the first-year experience and empower students to master the intricacies of scientific communication. These modules complement traditional in-class teaching and facilitate the acquisition of scientific writing skills by actively involving students through interactive unit-specific exercises and structured scaffolding of scientific writing concepts. By creating an inclusive learning environment aligned with Universal Design for Learning principles, we hope to bridge gaps in scientific communication skills. Preliminary data analysis, offers valuable insights into the effectiveness and potential impact of these modules, particularly on academic success and confidence. 

This article presents a “how-to” guide for redesigning an introductory physiology unit to emphasize the Core Concepts of Physiology. Detailed descriptions are provided of innovative, scalable, adjustments to content delivery, assessment, learning objectives, and activities. Staff reflections and student experience suggest a strong Core Concepts emphasis, while challenging, can promote critical thinking and develop an understanding of underlying chemical, physical and biological principles.
This article showcases the redesign of an introductory undergraduate vertebrate physiology unit at Murdoch University (BMS107) to promote student mastery of six Core Concepts of Physiology (Michael J, Cliff W, McFarland J, Modell H, Wright A, SpringerLink. The Core Concepts of Physiology: a New Paradigm for Teaching Physiology, 2017). Concepts were selected for their suitability in an introductory physiology unit and their ability to scaffold advanced physiology learning. Innovative curricular and pedagogical approaches were employed to 1) create a Core Concepts structure, 2) sell the Core Concepts approach to students, 3) foreground Core Concepts in learning materials, 4) actively engage students with Core Concepts, 5) revise, and 6) assess Core Concepts understanding. Median student marks and overall satisfaction with the unit were unaffected by the introduction of a Core Concepts approach. Notably, though, there was a 14% increase in student agreement with the statement “I received feedback that helped me to learn.” The challenge of the Core Concepts approach was articulated by students, but these novice learners also recognized Core Concepts as a mechanism to focus their understanding of physiology and promote critical thinking. For teaching staff, a Core Concepts approach was a reinvigorating opportunity to apply their expertise to the teaching of introductory physiology. We propose that a strong Core Concepts emphasis, while challenging, is highly rewarding for staff and provides students with a “disciplinary passport” that better prepares them to progress in diverse courses and professions. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This article presents a “how-to” guide for redesigning an introductory physiology unit to emphasize the Core Concepts of Physiology. Detailed descriptions are provided of innovative, scalable, adjustments to content delivery, assessment, learning objectives, and activities. Staff reflections and student experience suggest a strong Core Concepts emphasis, while challenging, can promote critical thinking and develop an understanding of underlying chemical, physical and biological principles.